---
title: "How to Get More YouTube Subscribers with Promotions (What ~$98 Actually Buys)"
description: "I ran 11 YouTube Promotions campaigns on my channel. Here's what RON465 (~$98) bought in subscribers and views, why it beats buying subs, and how to run your own."
date: 2026-10-26
categories: ["tools"]
tags: ["youtube","youtube-studio","channel-growth"]
---

import { Picture } from "astro:assets";
import Accordion from "@components/widgets/Accordion.astro";
import ListCheck from "@components/widgets/ListCheck.astro";
import Notice from "@components/widgets/Notice.astro";
import promosList from "../../assets/images/26/10/youtube-promotions-list.webp";
import promoDetails from "../../assets/images/26/10/youtube-promotion-details.webp";

Every channel owner hits the same wall at some point: the videos are decent, the upload schedule is fine, and the subscriber count still crawls. The sketchy fix is buying subscribers, which gets you bots that YouTube purges and a channel full of dead weight. The legitimate version of the same idea is YouTube Promotions: real ads, shown to real people, run through Google's own ad system.

I ran 11 promotions on my channel (WEBdoze, ~10.5k subscribers, 453 videos) between November 2025 and February 2026. Total spend: RON465.91, roughly **$98** at today's BNR rate of 4.777 RON/USD. Total return: 522,737 impressions, 21,378 views, and 4,674 subscribers. That works out to about **$0.021 per subscriber**, or RON0.10.

Here's my full campaign data, then the step-by-step if you want to run one yourself.

## What YouTube Promotions actually is

Promote is a simplified Google Ads campaign built directly into YouTube Studio. You skip the Google Ads interface entirely: pick a video, pick a goal, set targeting and budget, done. The catch is that promotions created on YouTube can only be managed on YouTube. If you want advanced bidding or deep analytics, you still need real Google Ads.

Three goals are available:

<ListCheck>
<ul>
<li><strong>Audience growth</strong> — optimizes for subscribers. This is the one I used on 10 of 11 campaigns</li>
<li><strong>Video views</strong> — optimizes for cheap views, subscriber count be damned</li>
<li><strong>Website visits</strong> — drives clicks to an external link</li>
</ul>
</ListCheck>

Promoted videos show up in the Home feed, YouTube search results, Watch Next, the Shorts feed, and as skippable in-stream ads, all labeled "Sponsored". Your video needs to be public or unlisted, at least 10 seconds long, and inside Google's editorial and video ad policies. A "subscriber" only counts if they subscribed within 3 days of watching at least 10 seconds of your video or clicking the promotion.

## The numbers from my 11 campaigns

Straight from my YouTube Studio. Costs in RON converted at 4.777 RON/USD; "views today" is each video's lifetime view count as of October 26, 2026, pulled from the YouTube API.

<Picture formats={["webp"]} fallbackFormat="webp"
  src={promosList}
  alt="YouTube Studio Promotions tab listing 11 ended campaigns with cost, impressions, views, and subscribers for each"
/>

| Video | Ended | Cost | Impressions | Views | Subs | Cost/sub | Views today |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stop Using Portainer? Arcane vs. Dockhand | Feb 13, 2026 | RON29.97 (~$6.27) | 37,059 | 1,615 | 328 | $0.019 | 10,221 |
| Channel-growth video (+7000 subs thumbnail) | Feb 13, 2026 | RON29.92 (~$6.26) | 37,896 | 1,414 | 342 | $0.018 | — |
| Minimax M2.5: The "Claude Killer" from China? | Feb 13, 2026 | RON29.91 (~$6.26) | 38,112 | 1,462 | 305 | $0.021 | 1,851 |
| Termix: Self-Hosted SSH & Server Manager | Jan 19, 2026 | RON49.91 (~$10.45) | 67,328 | 2,694 | 643 | $0.016 | 9,644 |
| ZeroByte: Open-Source Backup UI | Jan 19, 2026 | RON49.93 (~$10.45) | 70,276 | 2,809 | 601 | $0.017 | 5,962 |
| GLM 4.7 in Claude Code & Droid | Jan 31, 2026 | RON69.89 (~$14.63) | 75,341 | 3,718 | 873 | $0.017 | 9,859 |
| Stop Paying $100/mo! Free Anthropic Alternatives | Jan 19, 2026 | RON69.89 (~$14.63) | 92,084 | 3,943 | 805 | $0.018 | 5,108 |
| Self-Hosted vs Convex Cloud | Nov 26, 2025 | RON49.93 (~$10.45) | 30,009 | 1,087 | 199 | $0.053 | 1,730 |
| Cheap But Genius? Testing GLM 4.6 | Nov 26, 2025 | RON49.87 (~$10.44) | 38,539 | 1,546 | 337 | $0.031 | 5,486 |
| I Switched to Copilot Pro + Zed | Nov 24, 2025 | RON29.91 (~$6.26) | 30,461 | 958 | 241 | $0.026 | 6,581 |
| Convex + TanStack Combination | Nov 24, 2025 | RON6.78 (~$1.42) | 5,632 | 132 | 0 | n/a | 1,468 |

The Convex + TanStack row is the odd one out: it was my only campaign on the "Video views" goal instead of "Audience growth", and it delivered exactly zero subscribers. Goal choice isn't cosmetic.

## What the data taught me

**Cost per subscriber swung 3x between videos.** The GLM 4.7 video pulled 873 subs at $0.017 each. The Convex comparison cost $0.053 per sub. Same targeting, same channel, different videos. The ones that converted were timely AI-tool tests people were already searching for. Promotions amplify what a video already is; they don't fix a weak one.

**4,674 paid subscribers is about 45% of my entire sub count.** Real people, real accounts, no ToS violation. But I'd be lying if I called that organic growth. These subscribers found me through an ad in a cheap-CPM country, not through search or recommendations, and their watch behavior afterward is nothing like an organic sub's.

**Cheap geos are why the per-sub cost is so low.** My location targeting was India, Brazil, Malaysia, Indonesia, Nigeria, South Africa, Mexico, plus Austria, Germany, and Sweden for a bit of premium-geo mix. Subscribers in those markets cost a fraction of a US/UK sub. If your content monetizes on wealthy audiences, target accordingly and expect a higher cost per sub.

**Paid views were a minority of lifetime views.** The Arcane/Dockhand video got 1,615 paid views and sits at 10,221 total now. GLM 4.7: 3,718 paid of 9,859 total. The promotion bought the initial push; organic carried it the rest of the way. That's the real mechanism: you're buying discovery, not a finished audience.

## Step-by-step: run your own promotion

<Picture formats={["webp"]} fallbackFormat="webp"
  src={promoDetails}
  alt="YouTube Studio promotion details page showing goal, promoted video, headline, description, and location targeting for an ended campaign"
/>

1. Sign in to YouTube Studio, go to **Content**, then the **Promotions** tab.
2. Click **New Promotion**. First time only: link an existing Google Ads account or let YouTube create one.
3. Pick your goal. For subscribers, choose **Audience growth**. This matters more than it sounds, as my zero-subscriber "Video views" campaign shows.
4. Choose the video. YouTube auto-fills the promotion headline and description from the video metadata. Edit them; the promoted title is ad copy, not just a title.
5. Set targeting: languages, countries, age, gender, interests. YouTube shows your video to people most likely to engage based on your existing audience. When you target multiple locations, expect uneven delivery, YouTube warns about this in the UI.
6. Set budget and end date. My cheapest campaign ran on RON6.78 (~$1.42). Start small, look at cost-per-sub, then scale the videos that convert.
7. Hit **Promote**. To stop early, open the campaign details and set Status to Pause, or set the end date to today. The **Promote again** button reruns an ended campaign with identical settings.

There's also a "Follow-on views" toggle at the bottom of the setup: one side maximizes subscribers, the other optimizes for viewers more likely to engage with your content organically. For a subscriber campaign, leave it on the subscriber side.

## The honest caveats

<Notice type="warning" title="Read before spending">
Subscribers and watch time earned through Promote do not count toward YouTube Partner Program eligibility, per YouTube's own documentation. If you're chasing the 1,000-sub YPP threshold, these subs won't help you get there.
</Notice>

A few more things the dashboard won't tell you:

- **This is not steady growth.** The campaign ends, the trickle ends. You're renting attention, not building it. If your goal is a compounding audience, the video still has to be good enough that people subscribe and then come back.
- **Paid traffic looks different in analytics.** YouTube is upfront that promoted viewers retain and click differently than your organic audience. Expect a retention dip on promoted videos. It's not a bug.
- **Promotions don't hurt organic reach.** YouTube states promotion performance doesn't affect organic recommendations, which matches what I saw.
- **Buying subscribers is still worse.** Purchased subs are fake accounts that inflate a number, get purged, and can flag your channel. Promotions reach real humans who chose to subscribe. Just don't confuse a paid sub count with an engaged audience.

<Accordion label="Common questions" group="faq" expanded="true">

**Do promotion subscribers count toward monetization?** No. Subscribers and watch time from Promote don't count toward YouTube Partner Program eligibility.

**What's the cheapest useful budget?** I got measurable results at RON30 (~$6). Under that, delivery gets thin, though my RON6.78 test still produced 132 views.

**Audience growth or video views?** Audience growth for subscribers. My one "Video views" campaign produced zero subs on ~$1.42 spend, which tells you exactly what it's optimized for.

</Accordion>

## Bottom line

YouTube Promotions is the legitimate version of what people try to get from sub farms: a bigger subscriber number, fast. Around $98 bought me 4,674 real subscribers and 21k views. It works mechanically, and it beats buying bots by a mile.

Just keep the framing straight. It's a boost, not a strategy. The video still has to earn the sub, and the sub still has to turn into a viewer afterward. Spend on your best videos, watch cost-per-sub, and don't expect the number to mean more than it does.

## Related articles

- [How to Add YouTube Videos to Your Astro Blog](/add-youtube-videos-astro-blog/)
- [Responsive YouTube Embeds in Astro](/responsive-youtube-astrojs/)
- [Embed YouTube Videos in Gatsby](/embed-youtube-videos-to-gatsby/)