Podman vs Docker - Which Container Tool Should You Choose in 2025-2026?

Containers have changed how we build and run software. They package your app with everything it needs to work, making it run the same way everywhere. Two main tools lead this space: Docker and Podman. But which one should you choose?

This guide breaks down both tools in simple terms. You’ll learn about their differences, strengths, and which fits your needs best.

What Are Containers and Why Do They Matter?

Think of containers like shipping boxes for your software. Just as shipping containers let you move goods anywhere in the world, software containers let your apps run anywhere - your laptop, servers, or the cloud.

Consistency: Your app works the same way everywhere
Speed: Containers start in seconds, not minutes
Efficiency: Use fewer resources than virtual machines
Isolation: Apps don’t interfere with each other

Containers share the host operating system but keep apps separate. This makes them lightweight and fast. Unlike virtual machines, you don’t need a full OS for each app.

Virtual Machines: Each has its own full operating system
Containers: Share the host OS, just package the app and its needs

Result: Containers use less memory and start much faster.

Docker: The Container Pioneer

Docker launched in 2013 and made containers popular worldwide. It’s like the iPhone of containers - not the first, but the one that made the technology mainstream.

How Docker Works

Docker uses a client-server setup with three main parts:

Docker Client: The commands you type (like docker run)
Docker Daemon: Background service that does the actual work
Docker Registry: Where container images are stored (like Docker Hub)

The Docker daemon runs with admin privileges on your system. When you run a command, the client talks to the daemon, which manages your containers.

Docker’s Key Features

Docker has simple commands that are easy to remember. Most developers can learn the basics in a few hours. The Docker Desktop app provides a visual interface for beginners.

Docker Hub hosts millions of ready-to-use container images. You can find images for almost any software, from databases to web servers to development tools.

Docker has excellent guides, tutorials, and examples. The community creates tons of helpful content, making it easy to solve problems.

Podman: The Secure Alternative

Red Hat created Podman in 2018 as a more secure alternative to Docker. The name stands for “Pod Manager” and it aims to fix some security issues with Docker’s design.

How Podman Works

Unlike Docker, Podman doesn’t use a background daemon. Each command runs as its own process, then stops when done. This is more like how traditional Unix programs work.

Key Difference

Docker always runs a background service (daemon) that manages containers. Podman runs commands directly without a persistent background process.

Podman’s Main Advantages

No Root Access Needed: Runs containers without admin privileges
Better Security: No always-running background process to attack
Pod Support: Groups containers together like Kubernetes
Drop-in Replacement: Uses the same commands as Docker

Architecture: The Core Difference

The biggest difference between Docker and Podman is how they’re built.

Docker uses a client-server model:

Client: The docker command you type
Server: The Docker daemon running in the background
Communication: Client sends requests to daemon via API

Pros: Centralized management, can handle multiple clients Cons: Always uses system resources, needs root access, single point of failure

Podman runs commands directly:

Direct Execution: Each command runs as its own process
No Background Service: Nothing runs when you’re not using it
Fork-Exec Model: Like traditional Unix tools

Pros: No resource waste when idle, more secure, no single point of failure Cons: Some features work differently than Docker

Resource Usage Comparison

Scenario	Docker	Podman
When idle	~50-100 MB	0 MB
Running containers	Daemon + containers	Just containers
CPU usage	Constant low usage	Only when running commands

Security: Where They Really Differ

Security is where Podman shines compared to Docker.

Root Access Requirements

Traditional Docker:

Docker daemon runs as root (admin)
All containers inherit root privileges
If daemon is compromised, entire system at risk

Docker Rootless Mode:

Available but not default
Requires extra setup steps
Some features don’t work in rootless mode

Rootless by Default:

Containers run with regular user privileges
Each container isolated from system
No persistent root process

User Namespaces:

Maps container root to regular user
Provides isolation without system risk
Works seamlessly without extra setup

Security Winner

Podman is more secure by default. Its rootless containers and daemonless design reduce attack surfaces significantly.

Real-World Security Impact

In 2019, a major vulnerability (CVE-2019-5736) affected container runtimes. Docker users needed root access to exploit it, but Podman’s rootless design made the attack much harder.

Performance and Speed

Both tools perform well, but in different ways.

Container Startup Speed

Docker: Daemon can cache information, making repeat starts faster
Podman: No daemon overhead, but may be slower for repeated operations
Real Impact: Difference is usually under 1 second for most apps

Memory Usage

Docker:

Always uses memory for the daemon
Higher baseline memory usage
Good for servers running many containers

Podman:

Zero memory when not in use
Lower overall memory footprint
Better for development machines and edge devices

Build Performance

Both use similar build systems:

Feature	Docker (BuildKit)	Podman (Buildah)
Build Speed	Very fast	Competitive
Caching	Excellent	Good
Multi-stage	Yes	Yes
Rootless Building	Limited	Full support

Developer Experience

How easy are these tools to use day-to-day?

Command Compatibility

Good news: Podman uses the same commands as Docker!

# Docker commands
docker run nginx
docker build -t myapp .
docker ps

# Podman commands (identical)
podman run nginx
podman build -t myapp .
podman ps

You can even create an alias: alias docker=podman

IDE and Tool Support

Wide Support:

Visual Studio Code Docker extension
JetBrains IDE integration
GitHub Actions, GitLab CI built-in support
Every major cloud platform supports Docker

Mature Tooling:

Docker Compose for multi-container apps
Docker Desktop for easy local development
Extensive third-party tools and plugins

Growing Support:

VS Code extensions available
Red Hat OpenShift native integration
Kubernetes YAML generation built-in
systemd integration for service management

Enterprise Focus:

Strong in Red Hat environments
Good for security-focused organizations
Improving CI/CD integration

Multi-Container Applications

Docker Compose: Official tool for running multiple containers together Podman Compose: Community project that mimics Docker Compose

Compose Limitation

Podman Compose isn’t as mature as Docker Compose. Some advanced features may not work identically.

When to Choose Docker

Choose Docker If:

You’re new to containers: Easier learning curve and better documentation
Windows development: Better Windows support and Docker Desktop
Rich ecosystem needs: Need lots of third-party tools and integrations
Team familiarity: Your team already knows Docker well
Complex orchestration: Using Docker Swarm for container clusters

Docker Success Stories

Netflix: Uses Docker for microservices deployment
Spotify: Runs thousands of containers with Docker
Uber: Powers their data processing pipelines

When to Choose Podman

Choose Podman If:

Security first: Need rootless containers and better security
Linux environments: Working primarily on Linux systems
Kubernetes focus: Planning to use Kubernetes for orchestration
Resource efficiency: Want minimal resource usage when idle
Red Hat ecosystem: Using RHEL or OpenShift

Podman Adoption Examples

CERN: Uses Podman for high-performance computing
Red Hat: Ships Podman with Enterprise Linux
US Department of Defense: Evaluating for DevSecOps initiatives

Migration: Switching Between Tools

Docker to Podman

Moving from Docker to Podman is usually straightforward:

Install Podman on your system
Create alias: alias docker=podman
Test your containers - most work without changes
Update scripts for any Podman-specific features

Potential Issues

Migration Challenges

Some Docker Compose features may not work
Networking setup might need adjustment
Root vs rootless permissions could cause issues
Some third-party tools expect Docker daemon

Performance Benchmarks (2024 Update)

Recent tests show both tools perform similarly for most tasks:

Test	Docker	Podman	Winner
Container start time	0.8s	0.7s	Podman
Image build speed	45s	47s	Docker
Memory usage (idle)	95MB	0MB	Podman
CPU overhead	2%	0.5%	Podman

Real-World Impact

For most applications, the performance difference is minimal. Choose based on features and security needs, not raw performance.

Future Trends

Container Technology Evolution

Both tools are improving Kubernetes integration:

Podman generates Kubernetes YAML directly
Docker enhances Kubernetes compatibility
Industry moving toward Kubernetes as standard

Security remains a top priority:

More rootless container support
Better vulnerability scanning
Supply chain security improvements

Containers expanding to edge devices:

Smaller, more efficient runtimes
Better resource management
IoT and embedded system support

AI and Machine Learning

Both tools are adding better support for AI workloads:

GPU container support
Machine learning model serving
Distributed training capabilities

Making Your Decision

Start with Docker if you’re new to containers. It has:

Better learning resources
Larger community for help
More tutorials and examples
Docker Desktop for visual management

Choose Podman for better security:

Rootless containers by default
No privileged daemon process
Better compliance with security policies
Reduced attack surface

Consider both based on your stack:

Docker for diverse, multi-platform environments
Podman for Linux-heavy, security-conscious deployments
Many enterprises use both for different use cases

Quick Command Reference

Essential Docker Commands

docker run -d nginx                    # Run container in background
docker build -t myapp .                # Build image from Dockerfile
docker ps                              # List running containers
docker images                          # List images
docker exec -it container_name bash    # Access container shell

Essential Podman Commands

podman run -d nginx                    # Run container in background
podman build -t myapp .                # Build image from Dockerfile
podman ps                              # List running containers
podman images                          # List images
podman exec -it container_name bash    # Access container shell

Conclusion

Both Docker and Podman are excellent container tools, each with distinct advantages:

Docker remains the best choice for:

Beginners learning containers
Teams needing extensive ecosystem support
Windows-based development
Complex multi-container applications

Podman excels for:

Security-conscious environments
Linux-focused deployments
Resource-efficient operations
Kubernetes-native workflows

Final Recommendation

You don’t have to choose just one! Many organizations use Docker for development and Podman for production, or vice versa. The OCI standard ensures your containers work with both tools.

The container ecosystem continues evolving rapidly. Stay informed about new features and security updates for whichever tool you choose. Both Docker and Podman are actively developed and will remain important in the containerization landscape.

Remember: the best container tool is the one that fits your team’s needs, security requirements, and existing infrastructure. Start with one, learn its strengths and limitations, then evaluate if switching makes sense for your specific use case.

Want to explore more self-hosted applications? Check out toolhunt.net’s self-hosted section for amazing open-source tools you can run in containers.